Absent were the accusations they traded the past two months over the future of the former Soviet republic.
The Obama administration
continues to dismiss the notion of a new Cold War with Russia. But the
louder their protests, the more apparent the chill has become.
It was on display
Saturday in widely differing characterizations of a telephone
conversation between Secretary of State John Kerry and his Russian
counterpart, Sergey Lavrov, after news broke that Ukrainian President
Viktor Yanukovych left the capital because of what he described as a
"coup."
Kerry said the two agreed
on a need to resolve the political tumult in Ukraine without violence,
and that he expressed to Lavrov the importance of both countries
encouraging Ukraine to move toward constitutional change, according to
the State Department.
But Lavrov said he raised
concerns about "illegal extremist groups" refusing to surrender arms
and reiterated the conversation between their respective leaders. "Putin
called on Obama to use all opportunities to curb the radicals' illegal
actions and settle the situation by peaceful means," according to a
state-run ITAR-TASS report, which was tweeted by Russia's Foreign
Ministry.
In December, Kerry
snubbed Ukraine after it rejected an agreement to increase trade with
Europe. Instead he visited Moldova, which did sign the agreement.
There, Kerry insisted the
United States was not engaged in a bidding war with Russia over Ukraine
or any of the former Soviet republics.
Similar statements
ensued over the past few months, with the White House saying this week
the Ukraine conflict is not reminiscent of the "proxy conflicts of the
Cold War era."
#
Obama put a finer point
on showdown in Kiev this week, saying he didn't view U.S. and Russian
differences over Ukraine, or Syria, through that lens.
"Our approach as the
United States is not to see these as some Cold War chessboard in which
we're in competition with Russia. Our goal is to make sure that the
people of Ukraine are able to make decisions for themselves about their
future, that the people of Syria are able to make decisions without
having bombs going off and killing women and children, or chemical
weapons, or towns being starved because a despot wants to cling to
power."
Obama is right. It is
not the Cold War. Today, the United States has the upper hand
economically, militarily and diplomatically. But it does face a
resurgent, defiant and increasingly authoritarian Russia.
But, in essence, it is a
chessboard. And the crisis in Ukraine illustrates the latest moves
between Washington and Moscow as they compete for influence on the world
stage.
The disagreement between
the two powers over Ukraine is not entirely dissimilar to their power
play over the conflict in Syria. Until recently, Ukrainian President
Viktor Yanukovych was able to challenge his opposition's pro-Western
leanings with Russian political and financial backing, just as Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad in large part has been able to withstand three
years of civil war and threats of American military strikes with
Russian money, arms and diplomatic support.
But in both cases, Obama
matched Putin's moves with his own. Washington banned 20 officials from
the Russian-backed government in Kiev from traveling to the United
States, and has threatened further measures if government forces
continue their violent crackdown against protesters.
Frustrated with Moscow's
failure to enact any compromises from the Syrian regime at U.S.-Russian
sponsored peace talks in Geneva, the United States has now signaled it
is examining its policy options in Syria, where the bombing by
al-Assad's forces against civilians has intensified.
Putin's desire to
maintain a sphere of influence in the Middle East is in no ways limited
to Syria. He has met U.S. ambivalence toward the military-led government
by welcoming the de facto Egyptian leader, Field Marshal Abdel Fattah
El-Sisi, to Moscow this month, giving him an endorsement for his as-yet
undeclared candidacy for president and continuing discussions about a $2
billion arms deal for Egypt, even as the U.S. has suspended some
military support to Cairo.
The visit was a Russian
bid to rekindle a relationship that foundered since the Cold War, when
Egyptian President Anwar Sadat broke off ties with the Kremlin. The ties
remained frosty during Hosni Mubarak's 30-year rule. But the warm
reception of Sisi and Foreign Minister Nabil Fahmy also seemed designed
to send a message to the United States that Russia still has clout in
the region's most influential and populous country and is prepared to
increase its military ties.
Sport is not immune to
the rivalry between the two nations. Obama declined to attend the Sochi
Olympics, instead sending openly gay athletes in a clear jab at Russia's
anti-gay laws. It was the first time in more than a decade a U.S.
president, vice president, first lady or former president hasn't
attended an Olympic opening or closing ceremony.
The U.S. hockey victory
over the Russians in Sochi, the first American win since the collapse of
the Soviet Union in 1991, added insult to injury, presumably made even
more painful by the gloats of National Security Adviser Susan Rice, who
tweeted "U.S.A., U.S.A., U.S.A."
Overall, Putin's party
in Sochi was a relative success. Dire predictions of political protests
or a terrorist attack haven't materialized, and after a rocky start in
terms of preparations at some hotels and the condition of some venues,
the games were hailed by most athletes and the International Olympic
Committee athletes. Putin was even on his best behavior as he made a
visit to American athletes at the U.S. Olympic headquarters.
But now that the Sochi
games are coming to a close, Putin has even less incentive to play nice.
With the truce in Kiev shaky at best, the U.S. is bracing for an even
more audacious power grab for Ukraine -- whether that be financial
blackmail or even sending in its own forces if the violence continues.
It will then be up to
the U.S. to contemplate its next move on this chess board. With
Ukraine's future at stake, it's far from a game
No comments:
Post a Comment